Schism – Protestant anomaly

A remark on a Protestant blog brought to mind the fact that schism is really an impossibility on the terms of the Reformed Protestant. In the first place, one who is “elect” can never, ever leave the “invisible church,” just by definition. And in the second place, no visible ecclesial community has any real authority over the Christian that isn’t trumped by his own personal appeal to the Bible. Since (on the Calvinist’s erroneous reading of things) both churches and councils can and do err, the Christian’s appeal to the Bible is the final court of appeal for him. On what grounds can an ecclesial court (to say nothing of individual Calvinists) call a man “schismatic”? Any such accusation is purely and solely ad hoc.

And maybe most importantly: it would be grossly hypocritical. Either it is no sin, or Luther and Calvin were schismatics and their whole revolt was illegitimate. So I don’t see how a Reformed Protestant can ever consistently call schism a sin.

Posted in Protestantism

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 146 other subscribers
%d bloggers like this: